Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2020 13:32:08 GMT
|
|
|
Post by kreuzbergred on Feb 5, 2020 17:42:09 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 5, 2020 21:10:13 GMT
It just shows how ineffectual our leadership is that we didn't already have these powers in place. I'm betting this isn't dead yet, think a team will make it difficult for him to play at their venue. Wonder if the very left wing Canadian authorities will let him into the country (though it might be a home game scheduled to be played in some far flung foreign land).
|
|
|
Post by kreuzbergred on Feb 5, 2020 21:40:57 GMT
Catalan have Three games against Toronto Two in 🇫🇷 and In 🇨🇦 on the 29th august, Will Folau still be at the Dragons in Seven & A half months !!, Depends if he can keep off Social media.
|
|
|
Post by bonitared on Feb 5, 2020 22:44:19 GMT
I abhor his views. He shouldn’t be in the game. There’s been some very heartfelt and measured views on here. The only difficulty I have,which may have been covered previously,is that we become arbiters on the degree of revulsion. Clearly,Catalans should not have signed him,but should we have signed players that have been violent against women. Which is least bad ? I’m not sure I buy into the remorse argument,it’s too easy. I can’t see how Superleague can legislate for this,unless there’s a voluntary code not to sign players who bring the game into disrepute,but where does that stop. Catalans have let the side down,but I don’t think it’ll happen again any time soon and I bet his contract won’t be renewed.
|
|
|
Post by chang on Feb 5, 2020 22:50:04 GMT
Can’t remember Hardaker causing this much uproar after he called Childs a f*g, or the players who have assaulted people and taken drugs. Stop all of them playing or none of them.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 5, 2020 23:13:13 GMT
Can’t remember Hardaker causing this much uproar after he called Childs a f*g, or the players who have assaulted people and taken drugs. Stop all of them playing or none of them. I agree.
There's a moral high ground that can be taken.
That's why I personally never cheered for Johnson, his crime was beyond unforgivable.
Crimes deserve a punishment, the international RL community should set strict rules. Say they said that anyone (from any sport) trying to switch to RL was say a homophobic bigot (just a for instance obviously) they would be banned from playing RL for 5 years from the date they tried to register.
There you go job done.
|
|
|
Post by kreuzbergred on Feb 5, 2020 23:16:25 GMT
I abhor his views. He shouldn’t be in the game. There’s been some very heartfelt and measured views on here. The only difficulty I have,which may have been covered previously,is that we become arbiters on the degree of revulsion. Clearly,Catalans should not have signed him,but should we have signed players that have been violent against women. Which is least bad ? I’m not sure I buy into the remorse argument,it’s too easy. I can’t see how Superleague can legislate for this,unless there’s a voluntary code not to sign players who bring the game into disrepute,but where does that stop. Catalans have let the side down,but I don’t think it’ll happen again any time soon and I bet his contract won’t be renewed. I can't see him receiving mega Bucks or €s By the time he's fully fit (He's not played any Rugby at all since April 2019) it'll be March /April Hope he's still off the pace in just over a month when the Red Devils are in Perpignan, Playing in Europe is the only chance he's got for the next 3/4 years before he finishes playing, We'd better get used to seeing him in the Superleague I guess.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 5, 2020 23:30:06 GMT
I can't see him receiving mega Bucks or €s By the time he's fully fit (He's not played any Rugby at all since April 2019) it'll be March /April Hope he's still off the pace in just over a month when the Red Devils are in Perpignan, Playing in Europe is the only chance he's got for the next 3/4 years before he finishes playing, We'd better get used to seeing him in the Superleague I guess. You'd hope that fans make him feel incredibly unwelcome.
Nice to see the Wakefield chairman making it known that if any sponsors don't want to be associated Catalan game he will taken them to court.
I do wonder what would happen if a club just outright said he's not welcome, maybe Salford council as part owners of the stadium might say Catalans are welcome but he isn't at there facility.
|
|
|
Post by bonitared on Feb 5, 2020 23:40:13 GMT
The idea that a club could sue Catalans is unbelievable. On what basis? They’ve signed a player who has been ratified by the RFL. They had little option,legally. Clubs are posturing,and courting public opinion. Again,Les Catalans shouldn’t have signed this guy but that’s a different matter
|
|
|
Post by kreuzbergred on Feb 5, 2020 23:42:01 GMT
We'd probably end up with a Fine,
I am looking for a Devils mask and a Trident to wear at Perpignan I'll try to make Folau think I'm a Sort of Mastema type figure, but whether I'll get thrown out by Le Stewards before he comes close to me I'll have to wait & See. I do wonder that he'll understand the Word Mastema , He should as his first names Israel.
|
|
|
Post by redunderthebed on Feb 5, 2020 23:53:09 GMT
I’m getting pretty bored of the whole thing now. Catalans were my 2nd team. I wanted them to win when it didn’t impact on Salford. Not any more. They have let down the sport massively. But it’s happened now
One thing that is really winding me up though is the ‘Hardaker did the same thing’ line. He didn’t. What he did was bad. There was a big fuss about it at the time and he was banned for 5 matches. He did a proper apology and then went and voluntarily trained the Manchester Canalsiders to get a better understanding of the issues.
If he’d never played again I would have been fine with it, same with Johnson, Lui, Barba etc. but at least Hardaker tried to make some recompense for what he did. I don’t know if Johnson and Lui did. Johnson obviously spent time in prison.
(As an aside - MR I think saying you won’t cheer Johnson but you will cheer Lui who beat up his pregnant girlfriend is just as ‘hypocritical’ as the others you are calling out. In my view we are all guilty of our own versions of hypocrisy and choose what things we can live with)
Anyway. If I called a work colleague, say, a fat git in a moment of anger I would expect to get in trouble for it and possibly sacked. If I apologised to the person and the rest of my colleagues and went and did voluntary work to help people with body dysmorphia or something I would hope that I would be given a second chance but would understand if I wasn’t.
If, however, I posted on the intranet page that I thought all fat people were intrinsically evil and deserved eternal punishment for their gluttony I would expect to be sacked, no question. If I was asked to apologise and I said no and what’s more it’s their fault that some awful event happened I would expect to be doubly sacked. If I was then given repeated opportunities to apologise and challenged about it in job interviews and I just kept saying ‘no, it’s what I believe and you have no right to stop me saying it’ I would expect no decent employer to want to work for them. I would probably have only LBC or the ITV breakfast show to choose from for future employment.
That’s the difference between Hardaker and Folau
I’m no fan of Hardaker and I know he has more to add to his rap sheet than just the homophobic slur. I do like his honesty and his openness about the realization he has had and how he has tried sort himself out. His interview on the SL podcast last year with Dan Sarginson is well worth a watch
likening the two on the issue of homophobia is facile in my opinion.
Rant over
|
|
|
Post by Carnster on Feb 6, 2020 8:51:28 GMT
That's a great post Redunderthebed.
It's also bothered me that people seem to want to play bad behaviour top trumps rather than see the issue. There is inconsistency in this topic, and the reason there is is because every case is individual and they can't all be pigeon-holed into convenient punishments or given a blanket punishment that fits all. Do they get it wrong? Occasionally. Are they sometimes too lenient? Sure. Are they sometimes too severe? Absolutely.
People do deserve a chance at redemption. How many times do you give them that chance? How are those chances effected by the quality of support given to them to sufficiently overcome the challenge of change? These all presume that these people recognise their behaviour and intend to change.
The difference with Folau is that his behaviour is tied to his world views, and unless he ditches his religion he is not going to change. He has on more than one occasion spouted this nonsense and will do again.
|
|
|
Post by bigkeev on Feb 6, 2020 9:33:59 GMT
That's a great post Redunderthebed. It's also bothered me that people seem to want to play bad behaviour top trumps rather than see the issue. There is inconsistency in this topic, and the reason there is is because every case is individual and they can't all be pigeon-holed into convenient punishments or given a blanket punishment that fits all. Do they get it wrong? Occasionally. Are they sometimes too lenient? Sure. Are they sometimes too severe? Absolutely. People do deserve a chance at redemption. How many times do you give them that chance? How are those chances effected by the quality of support given to them to sufficiently overcome the challenge of change? These all presume that these people recognise their behaviour and intend to change. The difference with Folau is that his behaviour is tied to his world views, and unless he ditches his religion he is not going to change. He has on more than one occasion spouted this nonsense and will do again. I don't think its a case of playing "Top Trumps" to be honest mate, more for me a recognition that yes people do and say wrong, and punishments and sanctions are sometimes required. My argument is for me the punishment here doesn't fit the crime. His comments are distasteful no denying that, however I simply do not believe that what he said, is worse than what others did. That being the case for me he has to be given the opportunity, moving forward, to behave in a manner that we as a sport and a wider society expect. If he doesn't then the consequences whilst playing for Catalan have been made perfectly clear, there has been no lip service or ambiguity. You assume, perhaps understandably, that he will "do it again". Well perhaps he will but can we honestly start preemptively punishing people for what they may do in the future? Doesn't sound fair to me. In a way i'm glad there haven't been any insincere apologies from him that we all know he didn't really mean. At least were not being treated like idiots. I don't think its reasonable to insist people abandon fundamental beliefs and conform under any circumstances. As long as he keeps his mouth shut and doesn't preach i'm happy for him to believe whatever he likes. Like RUTB has said we are all guilty of our own hypocrisy and were likely to never all agree, all I would say is if we ban one for life, we ban them all. Zero tolerance is fine if its across the board. If not the are we truly as "Fair and Inclusive" as we pertain to be.
|
|
|
Post by chang on Feb 6, 2020 11:43:55 GMT
The most sickening part of this is saga is clubs trying using this incident to display how high and mighty and virtuous they are. I.E Wigan using the Catalan game as a LGBT event, sure they are a tolerant club who have values, but you can’t tell me they’re not taking advantage of it all for some easy marketing and to polish their image/ego.
|
|