|
Watto
Aug 22, 2017 7:03:17 GMT
JJR likes this
Post by Carnster on Aug 22, 2017 7:03:17 GMT
But Bonita is spot on Carnstar. Next year GOB could well return to the halves as Dobbo`s understudy. GOB played most of his Rugby with Lee Briers so should be no problem for him to adopt to the role. The point you're making wasn't the point of bonita's post. It was a wind-up post targeting a certain Salford demographic.
|
|
|
Watto
Aug 22, 2017 7:08:58 GMT
Post by manny on Aug 22, 2017 7:08:58 GMT
I don't know if it's rubbish but I heard O'Brien is going back to Warrington and we're getting Declan Patton.
|
|
|
Watto
Aug 22, 2017 7:23:51 GMT
via mobile
Post by gadger on Aug 22, 2017 7:23:51 GMT
I don't know if it's rubbish but I heard O'Brien is going back to Warrington and we're getting Declan Patton. Wouldn't surprise me but I hope it's not true. I'd like to see Obrien given a go at halfback, especially if Dobson is off at the end of the season
|
|
|
Watto
Aug 22, 2017 7:47:44 GMT
Post by JJR on Aug 22, 2017 7:47:44 GMT
Sorry disagree. We need a general in the halves and I can't see GOB doing that job. Somebody has to take charge of the backs and without Dobson everything seems disjointed.
Carney, as at Warrington, has shown glimpses but that's my disappointment with him, he's not taken over the general's role. Pity really he has the knowledge and skill.
When does Dobson's contract run out?
|
|
|
Watto
Aug 22, 2017 10:17:08 GMT
via mobile
Post by gadger on Aug 22, 2017 10:17:08 GMT
Not saying you are wrong, but how do we know Obrien can't do that?
Dobsons contract up after next season I think, but rumours are he is going to retire at the end of this season
|
|
|
Watto
Aug 22, 2017 10:31:30 GMT
Post by hammerlessnail on Aug 22, 2017 10:31:30 GMT
Not saying you are wrong, but how do we know Obrien can't do that? Dobsons contract up after next season I think, but rumours are he is going to retire at the end of this season Gareth never really managed to do it at Warrington, and was sent out on loan to various clubs. The feeling amongst the Warrington fans was that he wasn't quite sharp enough to be a Super League half-back. Salford's decision to move him to full-back was a masterstroke because it allowed him to operate as an extra pivot rather than the main one. Whether the additional experience he now has would make him a better half-back remains to be seen, but I have my doubts. Michael Dobson will be a huge loss to the squad, and to replace him with someone who hasn't played half-back for a long time would, I think, be a massive risk.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Watto
Aug 22, 2017 10:54:56 GMT
Post by Deleted on Aug 22, 2017 10:54:56 GMT
Dobson can only be replaced with a very experienced head, Patton is one for the future and GOB is an invaluable utility back at best, e don't have a squad packed with individually brilliant players so someone is needed to prompt and cajole them which is what Dobson does so well.
FIW I think Carney would raise to this task with a full pre season and clear mandate from the club, for me this year he has been used to much as a bit part player.
|
|
|
Post by JJR on Aug 23, 2017 8:03:22 GMT
Quote from Watto
'I'd rather be where we are than where Warrington & Leigh are'.
How true; we have to pay a price for 4th and semi with a small squad. 1st week off this season.
Reality check but we're safe!
|
|
|
Watto
Aug 23, 2017 8:46:03 GMT
via mobile
Post by dixon13 on Aug 23, 2017 8:46:03 GMT
Quote from Watto 'I'd rather be where we are than where Warrington & Leigh are'. How true; we have to pay a price for 4th and semi with a small squad. 1st week off this season. Reality check but we're safe! He can't say anything else.But I would sooner be where Cas are.We can't keep up the excuse a small squad that's down to the owner.Next February we set off again looking for 22 points probably with a small squad.
|
|
|
Post by SixOrSeven on Aug 23, 2017 9:38:50 GMT
Quote from Watto 'I'd rather be where we are than where Warrington & Leigh are'. How true; we have to pay a price for 4th and semi with a small squad. 1st week off this season. Reality check but we're safe! He can't say anything else.But I would sooner be where Cas are.We can't keep up the excuse a small squad that's down to the owner.Next February we set off again looking for 22 points probably with a small squad. I think everyone would like to be in the position Cas are in, however we should be focusing on the positives of our own season. The top 4 finish and the semi final were a great reward for the hard work the team put in and shows how far we have come since the million pound game. Hopefully the club see it as a stepping stone to push further next year.
|
|
|
Watto
Aug 23, 2017 10:29:06 GMT
Post by Carnster on Aug 23, 2017 10:29:06 GMT
Quote from Watto 'I'd rather be where we are than where Warrington & Leigh are'. How true; we have to pay a price for 4th and semi with a small squad. 1st week off this season. Reality check but we're safe! He can't say anything else.But I would sooner be where Cas are.We can't keep up the excuse a small squad that's down to the owner.Next February we set off again looking for 22 points probably with a small squad. Small squad is down to the fact that we couldn't recruit anyone until after the hooter in the MPG. Most players of any ability were already signed-up to their respective clubs or new clubs. There isn't an infinite pool of ready made RL superstars that teams can access whenever they like. Watson had to choose very carefully who to bring in knowing that the right people would be preferable over sub-par players there to make up the numbers. That's why we have a small squad. This has been pointed out to you constantly yet you parade-out your own version of reality. Let me say it again - The small squad is down to a combination of circumstances and choices made by Watson. We all know you have a downer on MK but attributing everything, and in some cases imagining, all the negatives around the club to him is simply deliberately dishonest on your part. MK has to shoulder criticism of many areas of the Club, but this isn't one of them. The squad is down to Watson. The small squad isn't an excuse it's the reality.
|
|
|
Watto
Aug 23, 2017 10:54:50 GMT
via mobile
Post by dixon13 on Aug 23, 2017 10:54:50 GMT
He can't say anything else.But I would sooner be where Cas are.We can't keep up the excuse a small squad that's down to the owner.Next February we set off again looking for 22 points probably with a small squad. Small squad is down to the fact that we couldn't recruit anyone until after the hooter in the MPG. Most players of any ability were already signed-up to their respective clubs or new clubs. There isn't an infinite pool of ready made RL superstars that teams can access whenever they like. Watson had to choose very carefully who to bring in knowing that the right people would be preferable over sub-par players there to make up the numbers. That's why we have a small squad. This has been pointed out to you constantly yet you parade-out your own version of reality. Let me say it again - The small squad is down to a combination of circumstances and choices made by Watson. We all know you have a downer on MK but attributing everything, and in some cases imagining, all the negatives around the club to him is simply deliberately dishonest on your part. MK has to shoulder criticism of many areas of the Club, but this isn't one of them. The squad is down to Watson. The small squad isn't an excuse it's the reality. I am sorry to disagree.I don't have a downer on Koucash as you put it.He told a meeting at the start of the season that basically he would not be putting money in we would only be spending what we get from sky and other money generated,thats he's choice.Other teams are recruiting for next season and they don't no where they will be playing.And by the way their his a number of youngsters from the Salford conurbation gone to Wigan Wire and Leigh in the last three months,but none to us.Like you have pointed out to the forum on many occasions we have achieved are goal for this season let's hope we are in the same position this time next year. If we are not we cannot use the argument we had a small squad.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Watto
Aug 23, 2017 11:13:51 GMT
Post by Deleted on Aug 23, 2017 11:13:51 GMT
There can be no denying we have a small squad but none of us can be certain if it was the size of squad Watson asked the owner for or that the owner bestowed on him, we can't know for certain if Watson has asked for certain players for next season or if he has been told the money available must be used to secure the services of the current squad.
I said many months ago the en masse resigning of the current squad is dangerous as there must always be a cull of a few and an injection of new blood into the system, my personal thoughts are that we have possibly gone to far down the retention route.
As Dixon mentions it is troubling that in the midst of our best season in a generation local talent is still not coming to the club but to our competitors, does the blame lie with a lack of scouting, finances or someone at the club in the Sheens ilk who goes to Koucash and says we need these players?
|
|
|
Watto
Aug 23, 2017 13:13:33 GMT
Post by Carnster on Aug 23, 2017 13:13:33 GMT
There can be no denying we have a small squad but none of us can be certain if it was the size of squad Watson asked the owner for or that the owner bestowed on him, we can't know for certain if Watson has asked for certain players for next season or if he has been told the money available must be used to secure the services of the current squad. I said many months ago the en masse resigning of the current squad is dangerous as there must always be a cull of a few and an injection of new blood into the system, my personal thoughts are that we have possibly gone to far down the retention route. As Dixon mentions it is troubling that in the midst of our best season in a generation local talent is still not coming to the club but to our competitors, does the blame lie with a lack of scouting, finances or someone at the club in the Sheens ilk who goes to Koucash and says we need these players? Salford has always had a strange relationship with the amateur game. Thirty-odd years ago, the influx of decent youngsters came towards Salford via Warrington. The Wire academy set-up was so bad that Wire supporting youngsters preferred to trial with Salford. The irony here is that with the appointment of a particularly poor academy coach meant a lot of those youngsters faded out of the game completely. Salford used to rely on some of the older heads at the club to basically do the scouting for them on the fly, without having anyone dedicated or paid to do the job. It seems that little has changed on that front over the years. The fact that we have abandoned the academy and we have yet to build a good reputation for stability means that most youngsters heads are turned in the direction of other clubs. One of the reasons Wigan, Saints, and Leeds have been so good at picking up youngsters is that they always employed proper scouts. Once a club gets a good reputation at bringing youngsters through it becomes a self-perpetuating feature. Hence why Wigan, Saints, and now Wire get the cream of the crop from the amateur game. I think the trouble with Salford, and it always has been, is the desire for quick fixes instead of putting into place long term goals that will help greatly to what they want to achieve. Not having an Academy at this stage could possibly set us back ten years in development with regards to fostering good relations with local teams, and enticing youngsters to want to play for us.
|
|
|
Watto
Aug 23, 2017 13:28:01 GMT
Post by JJR on Aug 23, 2017 13:28:01 GMT
Agree about the scouting system. With Sheens we had good links to Oz, BMM & Lui; now we've even lost that.
You're right quick fix initially in place but I don't blame the present set up. MK put big money in and our friend from Odsal (we seem to be a rest home for them) destroyed what was there by bringing in a completely new team for over the top money. (Chasehere, Sneyd to Cas) He had to go and then there was a succession of failures until Sheens and Watson. MK lost lots of money.
You can't blame MK for not keep wanting to throw big bucks in. Watson stated that there's a v big gap between Academy and 1st team and so when the pruning eventually came, the Academy had to go and he decided to pick young players up e.g. Murray and lower division players up e.g. Brining.
If the crowds come and the team moves forward I'm sure the Academy will be re- instated in some way. But Academy players are only potential.
|
|