|
Post by lhred on Mar 30, 2023 16:28:39 GMT
Does anyone else think we’re worse off this year?we let 7 leave and brought 5 in,also some big earners off the books in sarginson,escare ,and yet we have no cover in the backs and still a quota spot seems abit strange,know moneys tight but we seem worse off,think it’s reaching crunch point if the club want us to be top end intervention is needed as injuries are seriously derailing this season!
|
|
|
Post by cmillward20 on Mar 30, 2023 16:42:50 GMT
Does anyone else think we’re worse off this year?we let 7 leave and brought 5 in,also some big earners off the books in sarginson,escare ,and yet we have no cover in the backs and still a quota spot seems abit strange,know moneys tight but we seem worse off,think it’s reaching crunch point if the club want us to be top end intervention is needed as injuries are seriously derailing this season! Definitely a lot less depth this year and bar partington the lads we have brought in haven’t been improvements on what we had(so far)
|
|
|
Post by BDD on Mar 30, 2023 17:15:28 GMT
I am a little worried regarding our squad depth and makeup, especially with injuries creeping up to expose it.
We couldn't keep Luckley who won't be earning a fortune and stocked up on backrowers leaving the backs light. I was more worried when I heard Paul King say we are spending almost £2 million on wages. Let's make an assumption or two and do some math.
Let's say we are spending £1.95 million on wages and Croft is on £200k, only £150k of that wouldn count on the cap (if we spent over the cap). So, £1.95 million minus 50k would leave us with £1.9 million taken up on the cap. If you added another marquee player that would be £2.05 million, leaving you 50k. Are you telling me that our squad is one marquee player and another at £50k (well below the average wage of £85k) below say Warrington who signed Vaughan, McGuire, Kasiano, Dudson and Dufty late last year, plus they have Williams, Clarke, and Currie who won't be on peanuts. Neither will Ratchford or Matautia. I look at the two teams and figure we should be spending similar amounts in the backs, maybe us a little more, but in the forwards, I don't see them only spending a Vaughan more than us.
|
|
|
Post by lhred on Mar 30, 2023 17:24:49 GMT
Yes it looks strange,I’m presuming these new contracts for Watkins burgess etc are where some of our moneys gone!just looks a strange squad just no cover in the backs and about 10 2nd rowers!some of it is luck,Leigh at the minute are doing well with a small squad but no injuries as yet,
|
|
|
Post by redunderthebed on Mar 30, 2023 21:16:36 GMT
I think we’re in a stronger position than last year. We were struggling to buy a win this time last year with Burgess, Sarge and King injured
Sarge only played about 6 games last year due to injuries so, while he’s a big loss on paper, not sure he is in reality. Personally I think we’re better off without Escare but we are short of full back cover. Cross, Lafai and Sio played every game last year so we didn’t need much cover.
We have same lack of cover in halves and hooker as last year. Of the forwards we lost, Luckley is a loss but Sidlow is looking a good replacement, and we have loads of 2nd rowers to cover Livett leaving.
I bet our average wage is as high or higher than most other super league teams. Saints, Wigan, Warrington, Huddersfield, Catalans and a few others will have 6-8 academy products on the SL minimum wage of £20k. Then a number of them - Welsby, Lomax, Thewlis, Smith, Newman, etc who will get the discount off the salary cap along with the marquee signing players. Warrington will have less advantage than Wigan, saints, Leeds for that as they have fewer academy products in the team.
|
|
|
Post by BDD on Mar 30, 2023 22:59:23 GMT
We definitely have our best squad in decades and can beat anyone on our day. Our forwards play greater than the sum of their parts and we have some class in the backs. Rowley is our superpower though, imo. He gives the lads confidence and freedom to be better as a team. I'm not having a go at the players in any way. We're the best team to watch in SL (most week... lookig to you Hull KR and Wakey 🤣). It's just, on paper, I don't see how we are spending nearly £2 million.
Those players on £20k don't count towards the cap, I don't think. Only the highest 25 paid players do, which I think is a joke. It's another way for the bigger teams to spend even more money on their overall roster. It should be the top 30 like it is in the NRL.
The academy dispensation (another thing in the favour of the big teams) is quite negligible, though for Saints having say, Roby and Lomax as marquee palyers, they only count as £70k and not £150k (another joke to benefit certain teams)... Warrington don't have that with Williams and who ever else (McGuire, Vaughan, Dufty?). Nor do Hull. Leeds probably don't with their current squad. I imagine Farrell may be one for Wigan but no other local lad. Catalans marquee player will not be the French lads. So for most teams their marquee players are costing £300k on the cap, leaving £1.8m for the other 23 players. So, basically we aren't using the second marquee spot but are spending the rest. So, if we take away Brodie's wage we are spending around £1.8 on, not just the other 24 players, but the entire squad - 26 is it? If so, that's £70k for each of those 26 players, on average. For that money I think we should a bit more quality in the pack and as cover for the backs. I was shocked when I heard how much we were spending, I thought we'd have been around £1.8 including Brodie... leaving around £300k to spend (a £150k type of prop, another quality prop in the £80-100k, and some depth in the outside backs £50-£70 split between two players).
|
|
|
Post by redunderthebed on Mar 31, 2023 0:03:35 GMT
Wigan, as an example, home grown players in 1st team squad are, I think:
Marshall Smith Powell Byrne Farrell Smithies Harvard Pearce-Paul Shorrocks Thorniley O’Neill Astley Sutton Hill Nsemba Eckersley Douglas Hampshire
Possibly Tom Forber too
My guess is that all those from O’Neill down will be on £20k contracts except Hampshire. Possibly Shorrocks and Thorniley too. That’s 7-9 players. Or 20-25% of the squad. We don’t have that luxury. One or two of the lads who were part time might not be on much more than that but we can’t afford to fill our squad cos we have to pay them more money.
Of the top 8, some of those will be on over £70k so the rest won’t count towards the cap
|
|
|
Post by redunderthebed on Mar 31, 2023 0:30:12 GMT
Warrington:
Thewlis Wrench Darbyshire Lynch Thewlis Jr Dean Hayes Philbin Thomas Reddeclife Schingler Doolan Currie Whitehead Holroyd
So 15 of their 34 man squad is either on academy graduate £20k or is eligible for salary cap discount
Realistically the difference is that the youngsters enable the big clubs to name 22 man squads during injury crises unlike us getting to 19.
By the way I think we do pay relatively high wages for the quality of our players. Partly cos we have to. Players will play for less cash if they are more likely to win trophies (or the club has a recent history of doing so) and if they have been there since they were kids. Part of it is just cos that’s what we do.
But realistically most other SL clubs have a 25 man squad who have a chance of playing regularly plus kids to give cover in emergencies and rest an extra player or two through the season. Our top 20 or so are paid a similar level to other clubs top 20-25 but we discount less against marquee and home grown rules. Think we are £3-400k below salary cap. For most clubs c£150k of that will be 7 young players who have little chance of playing more than a game or two.
Other SL clubs without a cat 1 academy
Leigh have a 28 man squad and haven’t had a proper academy for years. Hull KR have 31 and will benefit from the old City of Hull academy Cas have 36 (!!) but haven’t had the disruption in their junior development that we have
All 3 of those will be closer to the cap than us but I wouldn’t swap our squad for any of theirs.
|
|
|
Post by worsleyreddevil on Mar 31, 2023 11:09:45 GMT
This is becoming a joke now, we are down to 3 fit Props and numerous 2nd Rows. Need Greenwood in for Size or a Prop in on loan. No Ackers or Bourouh, we need to stop moaning about injuries and get creative, swap 2nd Rows for Props, etc.
/photo/1
|
|
|
Post by cmillward20 on Mar 31, 2023 11:16:06 GMT
Not very confident for Sunday with this squad tbh. Backs are still good but with the way we’ve been playing and how safe hudds play.
|
|
|
Post by lhred on Mar 31, 2023 11:22:07 GMT
But the point is why name a 19 man squad when lannon and greenwood are fit to which makes 21!oh I get it rowley being the master coach with his mind games again!
|
|
|
Post by kilop on Mar 31, 2023 13:42:07 GMT
Good squad that. Quite fancy us against this rigid boring lot. Thought we looked better with atkin at acting half than Borough and moved it around quicker
|
|
|
Post by redunderthebed on Mar 31, 2023 13:48:31 GMT
I assume Wright will be the 4th prop. Or Dupree might do all 80 minutes this week! I reckon Williams and Hellewell miss out:
Brierley Sio Cross Costello Burgess Croft Sneyd Dupree Atkin Ormondroyd Watkins Dixon Addy
King Wright Longstaff Stone
|
|
|
Post by mauricethered on Mar 31, 2023 13:57:46 GMT
Good squad that. Quite fancy us against this rigid boring lot. Thought we looked better with atkin at acting half than Borough and moved it around quicker I am normally glass half full but this weekends game has me concerned. Hudds have big forwards, we have 3 Props and no specialist hooker. We will only win if we can contain their forwards otherwise it is a long afternoon. The clubs lust for 2nd rows make no sense, we need personnel in - a back or Prop, look at the business KR/Wakey are doing this season, player swaps.
|
|
|
Post by JJR on Mar 31, 2023 14:08:53 GMT
We’ll miss Sidlow, he was immense last week
Probably means we’ll play more of a running and kicking game….Hudds have a few missing….Hellewell might be in to sub for Addy
|
|