|
Post by lhred on Oct 21, 2024 8:49:40 GMT
They also predate Paul king as well as these monies owed to council are from koucash so again let’s have the proper facts instead of assuming it’s the Paul king era!
|
|
|
Post by JJR on Oct 21, 2024 9:25:29 GMT
Presumably the £1.5M is the CVA, which even pre-dates Koukash….but wasn’t there a Board member who set that up in the JW days and wasn’t more large sums paid out to end the CVA….but somehow it’s still there in some form
Mysterious…but then again it’s finance hidden away from those who support
|
|
|
Post by BIMBAM on Oct 21, 2024 10:23:54 GMT
Funny how there was supposed to be an NDA in place for all finances discussed at council level, yet here we are with figures being banded about. Do we think they have come from the direction of loose Tory lips?
|
|
|
Post by russ on Oct 21, 2024 11:03:18 GMT
Funny how there was supposed to be an NDA in place for all finances discussed at council level, yet here we are with figures being banded about. Do we think they have come from the direction of loose Tory lips? People on here don't politics being mentioned but this is a classic choose your political poison issue.
This in little more than a social responsibility versus absentee landlord argument.
|
|
|
Post by russ on Oct 21, 2024 16:44:58 GMT
I asked the question about the marketing strategy of signings being revealed bit by bit and whether or not it was working .... the fact that it's so quiet on a forum of diehard fans would suggest it isn't.
The news on Rowles and Kurt was good as well as the signing of Davis and the look at Brierley's season but all that was expected, will keep us informed but it will miss a little of what a new signing brings to the excitement levels.
|
|
|
Post by JJR on Oct 22, 2024 8:56:24 GMT
Funny how there was supposed to be an NDA in place for all finances discussed at council level, yet here we are with figures being banded about. Do we think they have come from the direction of loose Tory lips? I think all historical public financial info is available under the Freedom of Information Act…so journalists can get it anyway…probably after a nudge But as a ratepayer, community share holder and a season ticket holder I have no issues with financial information being in the open…quite the opposite…it should be there….but we never see it…and shareholders usually have access to good financial info We’re continually asked to invest or fund…we get all sorts of stories with positive spin, get little information of any kind from the Club…except when funds are needed…and we all just have to ‘believe’. Let’s just have openness and reality.
|
|
|
Post by russ on Oct 22, 2024 13:36:42 GMT
I think it's more a case of keeping most data in house because some ne'erdowells will use it for political reasons that contain almost no thought for any taxpayers except as foils or media dressing.
|
|