|
|
Murrey
Sept 27, 2019 10:02:15 GMT
via mobile
Post by david105 on Sept 27, 2019 10:02:15 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Murrey
Sept 27, 2019 10:11:17 GMT
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Sept 27, 2019 10:11:17 GMT
Saw that as well. Seems inevitable.
|
|
|
|
Murrey
Sept 27, 2019 10:28:21 GMT
via mobile
Post by david105 on Sept 27, 2019 10:28:21 GMT
I think Lannon will turn out the better player but as people are saying his seems to have an had attitude problem at KR. Where murrey is the ultimate pro. Think it will work for both teams.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Murrey
Sept 27, 2019 10:42:17 GMT
Post by Deleted on Sept 27, 2019 10:42:17 GMT
Ideal scenario is to keep both but that's unlikely.
It's about wayying up the pros and cons of each, Lannon is an 80 minute 2nd row who can at a push fill in in the centres and potentially #13 where as Murray is a smaller prop who can slot into the 2nd row.
For me I'd think Murray would b a better long term asset to the club.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Murrey
Sept 27, 2019 10:43:40 GMT
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Sept 27, 2019 10:43:40 GMT
I think Lannon will turn out the better player but as people are saying his seems to have an had attitude problem at KR. Where murrey is the ultimate pro. Think it will work for both teams. I think he just didn’t settle and then fell out with the new coach. These things happen. I like them both. Wish Murray well at KR. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Murrey
Sept 27, 2019 10:46:08 GMT
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Sept 27, 2019 10:46:08 GMT
Ideal scenario is to keep both but that's unlikely. It's about wayying up the pros and cons of each, Lannon is an 80 minute 2nd row who can at a push fill in in the centres and potentially #13 where as Murray is a smaller prop who can slot into the 2nd row. For me I'd think Murray would b a better long term asset to the club. Next year we are light at second row and have a few props. Lannon has played through the middle before as well. It makes sense, although I’d also have preferred both to stay. |
|
