|
|
Post by bandgeekmafia78 on Aug 9, 2016 8:08:57 GMT
Well seeing as Huddersfield next games are Featherstone at home, Batley away and London at home I'd guess he'll get 3 games and they bring Brierley in to cover him. The fixtures for Huddersfield have been pretty kind on Brough and the Giants. Imagine they had tougher SuperLeague standard teams to play without him in the squad... could have been a disaster. |
|
|
|
Post by osrd on Aug 9, 2016 16:57:49 GMT
I wouldn't be surprised if the charge gets downgraded Two matches and £300 fine,the RFL disciplinary system is not fit for purpose in my opinion,that was an intentional attack on a player who was on the ground,a diabolical situation. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 9, 2016 17:10:31 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by russ on Aug 9, 2016 19:07:58 GMT
Two games! Two Chuffin' games?
Surely, what the doc says is the least important thing in this travesty.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 9, 2016 20:03:56 GMT
Oh I agree 2 games is indicative of how corrupt the RFL are, the last thing they want is a Leeds or Hudds going down so they 'massage' the judicial system. What won't help if the Doc goes of on a drink inspired rant.
|
|
|
|
Post by russ on Aug 9, 2016 20:32:30 GMT
Oh I agree 2 games is indicative of how corrupt the RFL are, the last thing they want is a Leeds or Hudds going down so they 'massage' the judicial system. What won't help if the Doc goes of on a drink inspired rant. No I don't think it's a conspiracy just a **** up. And I won't put the onus on Marwan because this should make everyone angry. Eyes on the prize Doc, keep the faith stick around for what's to come. |
|
|
|
Post by bandgeekmafia78 on Aug 10, 2016 9:03:14 GMT
The RFL's comments regarding the ban handed to Brough - "It is argued it was not deliberate or reckless contact ".
Staggering!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 10, 2016 16:08:32 GMT
"It is argued it was not deliberate or reckless contact "
I'll argue Brough is a CNUT, there's even less defence against that argument.
|
|
