Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 8, 2016 13:44:29 GMT
Danny Brough charged with a grade C offence for his cowardly strike on Logan Tomkins.
i hope they throw the book at him!
|
|
|
|
Post by kreuzberg999 on Aug 8, 2016 13:56:37 GMT
He'd probably Nut the book and Blame it on his height.
|
|
|
|
Post by bandgeekmafia78 on Aug 8, 2016 13:58:18 GMT
Grade C carries 2-3 game recommended ban. A real worry if you are a Giants fan!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 8, 2016 14:02:18 GMT
While I loathe Brough I'd hate to see Huddersfield drop down, if they did in all reality it would be Leigh who would take there place and God I couldn't contemplate that.
Had anything gone on before with Tomkins to prompt him to do this?
|
|
|
|
Post by russ on Aug 8, 2016 14:08:03 GMT
Danny Brough charged with a grade C offence for his cowardly strike on Logan Tomkins.
i hope they throw the book at him! Then I'd wait for his ban to be over and sign him.  |
|
|
|
Post by bandgeekmafia78 on Aug 8, 2016 14:16:45 GMT
Danny Brough charged with a grade C offence for his cowardly strike on Logan Tomkins.
i hope they throw the book at him! Then I'd wait for his ban to be over and sign him. Not for me. Far too much of a trouble-causer for my liking. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 8, 2016 14:48:30 GMT
While I loathe Brough I'd hate to see Huddersfield drop down, if they did in all reality it would be Leigh who would take there place and God I couldn't contemplate that. Had anything gone on before with Tomkins to prompt him to do this? No, he just seemed intent on having a go at anyone in his sight. |
|
|
|
Post by bonitared on Aug 8, 2016 15:26:34 GMT
And while they're at it they should do him for the cannonball in the last game
|
|
|
|
Post by bandgeekmafia78 on Aug 8, 2016 18:52:48 GMT
According to the RFL's disciplinary guidelines, intentional use of the elbow to strike another player carries a minimum length ban of 8 games. Therefore, how can a ban of 2-3 games be suggested? That seems rather contradictory by the RFL...
Edit: 'recklessly' striking with the elbow is a 2-4 game ban, 'intentionally' is 8+
|
|
|
|
Post by Astleyred on Aug 8, 2016 18:52:58 GMT
I've said the same hope they throw the book at the horrible little runt.
If he gets the 3 games could have a big bearing on Huddersfields fight for the top 4, as they don't look to have any direction without him.
Hope they stay up though.
|
|
|
|
Post by red666 on Aug 8, 2016 21:58:51 GMT
I wouldn't be surprised if the charge gets downgraded
|
|
|
|
Post by bonitared on Aug 8, 2016 23:00:21 GMT
I wasn't at the game but if it's the incident on the highlights I think 2 or 3 games is sufficient.
He is indeed a horrible little irritant and he seems to escape most of the time.
I'd prefer Huddersfield didn't go down as Ken Davy seems a top bloke with his heart in the right place
|
|
|
|
Post by russ on Aug 9, 2016 5:38:49 GMT
I wasn't at the game but if it's the incident on the highlights I think 2 or 3 games is sufficient. He is indeed a horrible little irritant and he seems to escape most of the time. I'd prefer Huddersfield didn't go down as Ken Davy seems a top bloke with his heart in the right place If the difference is between reckless and intentional this was as deliberate as they come and it's little wonder such logic has fans shaking their heads in disbelief! |
|
|
|
Post by Astleyred on Aug 9, 2016 6:48:58 GMT
After looking at the footage the play had moved on, Tomkins was on his back and he blatently put the elbow into his face.
8+ for intentional use
2-4 reckless use
For me me it was as intentional as they come but knowing how the RFL view things it'll be 1-2 max.
Remember Sinfields unintentional head butt on Dorn.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 9, 2016 6:54:41 GMT
Well seeing as Huddersfield next games are Featherstone at home, Batley away and London at home I'd guess he'll get 3 games and they bring Brierley in to cover him.
|
|
