Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 11, 2019 19:04:42 GMT
Now announced:
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 11, 2019 19:05:35 GMT
Seems strange to give Wood 9 - would have thought he’d be 7 when we have 2 other hookers. 7 remains vacant
|
|
|
|
Post by buxtonred60 on Jan 11, 2019 19:34:30 GMT
no complaints. Im proud wood has got 9, worked his socks last 2 seasons.
I think no number 7 is Hastings choice, as quite a lot of kids bought shirts towards the end of the season with 31 on the back, and he is all for the fans.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 11, 2019 19:40:55 GMT
no complaints. Im proud wood has got 9, worked his socks last 2 seasons. I think no number 7 is Hastings choice, as quite a lot of kids bought shirts towards the end of the season with 31 on the back, and he is all for the fans. Still say the RFL shots itself in the foot when they won't let a team register a number that would be excellent for marketing. Hastings #1066 would be inspired. |
|
|
|
Post by chang on Jan 11, 2019 21:06:55 GMT
no complaints. Im proud wood has got 9, worked his socks last 2 seasons. I think no number 7 is Hastings choice, as quite a lot of kids bought shirts towards the end of the season with 31 on the back, and he is all for the fans. Still say the RFL shots itself in the foot when they won't let a team register a number that would be excellent for marketing. Hastings #1066 would be inspired. Let’s have it right, one man and his dog would care about that pun. So wouldn’t be worth the hassle. (I get it btw so no disrespect, I like it!) |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 11, 2019 21:18:32 GMT
Even if letting Salford give Hastings #1066 led to a little publicity it would be good.
As it is it can only be considered a missed opportunity.
|
|
|
|
Post by Carnster on Jan 11, 2019 22:28:01 GMT
Twitter is like having a direct connection with a victorian asylum. It seems to be full of people saying 'why Hastings not 7?' 'Why Sio not 5?' failing to understand that first teamers get to choose their numbers if available.
|
|
|
|
Post by russ on Jan 12, 2019 12:15:10 GMT
Twitter is like having a direct connection with a victorian asylum. What an insult to the patients in Bedlam! But this looks pretty good for a club with no readies  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 12, 2019 12:41:08 GMT
That list does throw up a tricky issue though, how do you crow bar in Lussick, Tomkins and Wood into the match day 17?
All to good not to be involved for me.
|
|
|
|
Post by JJR on Jan 12, 2019 15:25:32 GMT
At the moment, easy. Two of them I injured.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 12, 2019 15:26:26 GMT
At the moment, easy. Two of them I injured. Is that on the back of today?
No doubt Lussick could do the full 80 if needed.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 12, 2019 15:29:46 GMT
At the moment, easy. Two of them I injured. Is that on the back of today?
No doubt Lussick could do the full 80 if needed.
No still niggling injuries from last season. Wood isn’t far off though. |
|
|
|
Post by JJR on Jan 12, 2019 15:51:53 GMT
Tomkins still off from last season.
|
|
|
|
Post by johnh1 on Jan 21, 2019 4:11:28 GMT
With Walker and Lawton unavailable, and Tomkins and Chamberlain injured, that leaves us with 21 players available. Going to be tough without any more signings.
|
|
