|
Post by godsowncountry on Aug 24, 2021 13:53:51 GMT
Salford Red Devils have been fined £25,000 (£12,500 suspended for one year) for integrity breaches of the Covid protocols which led to the postponements of their Super League fixtures against Wakefield Trinity and Hull FC. #RugbyLeague
|
|
|
Post by godsowncountry on Aug 24, 2021 14:18:31 GMT
Another 2 clubs also fined
Castleford Tigers, Huddersfield Giants and Salford Red Devils have been fined for breaches of RFL Operational Rules.
The Tigers are fined £35,000 (£15,000 suspended for two years) for failing to fulfil a Betfred Super League fixture against St Helens on 30 June and for breaching Covid protocols on the return coach journey from the Betfred Challenge Cup Final at Wembley Stadium in July. A subsequent Covid outbreak at the club, resulting from a lack of social distancing on the coach, led to the postponement of additional Betfred Super League fixtures against Catalans Dragons (Saturday 24 July) and Leigh Centurions (Thursday 29 July).
Huddersfield Giants are fined £30,000 (£15,000 suspended for two years) for failing to fulfil a Betfred Super League fixture with Castleford on 6 July. Like Castleford in respect of the St Helens fixture, the Giants stated that they did not have enough players available.
In both cases the RFL advised that there were no grounds for postponement within the regulatory framework agreed between Super League clubs and the RFL – a framework which differentiates between matches that a club is unable to fulfil for Covid-related reasons and matches a club is unable to play due to other player availability issues. The clubs were also warned that failure to fulfil the fixtures could be considered ‘Misconduct’ under the game’s Operational Rules.
Separately, the RFL Board ruled that each club had effectively forfeited the game, and that their opponents be awarded the match and the competition points by a deemed score of 24-0.
Salford Red Devils have been fined £25,000 (£12,500 suspended for one year) for breaches of Covid protocols which led to the postponements of two Betfred Super League fixtures this season. A significant Covid outbreak at the club, caused by the club’s failure to properly enforce RFL Covid protocols within its Designated Sporting Environment (DSE), resulted in the postponement of matches against Wakefield Trinity (1 July) and Hull FC (5 July).
The fines reflect the RFL’s determination to protect the integrity of, and confidence in, professional Rugby League competitions. In reaching ‘agreed decisions’ with the clubs, the RFL re-emphasises the sport’s obligations to clubs, supporters, and commercial and broadcaster partners who are affected by such postponements and cancellations.
Castleford Tigers has released the following statement following the RFL’s fine:
Castleford Tigers are disappointed but ultimately accept the RFL’s decision to fine the club, following the extenuating circumstances which led to the Tigers’ Betfred Super League match against St Helens not being fulfilled on the 30th of June.
As was stated to both the RFL and St Helens, Castleford Tigers had just fourteen First Team players available due to injuries, and Covid-19 protocols being followed meant that the Club could not call upon its Academy or young players. Further details about that can be found in our original statement from June, which you can read here.
Castleford Tigers could not postpone the fixture on the 30th of June due to the number of players outside of the Club’s top 25 earners not being affected at that time by Covid protocols. Every effort was made by Castleford Tigers to field a team for the match until it was ultimately too late, and the game needed to be cancelled, much to the Club’s disappointment.
Castleford Tigers did however field a team for the match against Huddersfield Giants on 2nd August, despite meeting the RFL’s framework for a postponement due to player availability for Covid related reasons.
|
|
|
Post by mauricethered on Aug 24, 2021 14:46:38 GMT
Another fine from those clowns at the RFL - Who think that a percentage mechanism for points is adequate when some teams play significantly more games than others.
Bunch of clueless idiots the RFL with nothing better to do than enforce rules no one else can interpret nor understand.
|
|
|
Post by dixon13 on Aug 24, 2021 15:47:39 GMT
Another fine from those clowns at the RFL - Who think that a percentage mechanism for points is adequate when some teams play significantly more games than others. Bunch of clueless idiots the RFL with nothing better to do than enforce rules no one else can interpret nor understand. Mauricethered. I suppose even an idiot as to justify why he is an idiot.
|
|
|
Post by redunderthebed on Aug 24, 2021 16:26:24 GMT
🤷♂️ 🤦♂️
|
|
|
Post by stadge on Aug 24, 2021 18:23:10 GMT
Seems its not just the discipline on the field then!
|
|
|
Post by giasf on Aug 25, 2021 7:03:04 GMT
It’s just not the year to be imposing cash fines on clubs. Entire amount for all parties should have been suspended.
|
|
|
Post by JJR on Aug 25, 2021 7:18:19 GMT
I just don’t understand the Leagues reasoning for just 3 clubs. But that’s why it’s all in a mess
|
|
|
Post by johnno on Aug 25, 2021 7:39:57 GMT
I just don’t understand the Leagues reasoning for just 3 clubs. But that’s why it’s all in a mess The article seems to say that: -Hudds and Cas have been fined for failing to fulfil a fixture, without having enough COVID cases to justify the postponement. - Salford and Cas have been fined for not following COVID protocols So Salford haven’t been pulled for failing to fulfil a fixture. It says Cas players didn’t social distance on the way back from Wembley. Doesn’t say exactly what Salford did - or how the RFL found out.
|
|
|
Post by osrd on Aug 25, 2021 7:54:09 GMT
I just don’t understand the Leagues reasoning for just 3 clubs. But that’s why it’s all in a mess The article seems to say that: -Hudds and Cas have been fined for failing to fulfil a fixture, without having enough COVID cases to justify the postponement. - Salford and Cas have been fined for not following COVID protocols So Salford haven’t been pulled for failing to fulfil a fixture. It says Cas players didn’t social distance on the way back from Wembley. Doesn’t say exactly what Salford did - or how the RFL found out. Johnno as you say in the case of Salford we only have half a story, as usual, and it would be interesting to find out exactly the reason for this fine.
|
|
|
Post by tony13 on Aug 25, 2021 9:25:01 GMT
The reason for the fine? We're Salford and we've been a bit uppity these last two years. Old Trafford AND Wembley! Who do you think you are? This is said only partly in jest.
|
|
|
Post by chief on Aug 25, 2021 10:24:08 GMT
The reason for the fine? We're Salford and we've been a bit uppity these last two years. Old Trafford AND Wembley! Who do you think you are? This is said only partly in jest. Just because you are paranoid it doesn't mean they're not all out to get you
|
|